Skip to main content

Is Passion the P in PhD?



If you have 'passion' for something, it means you haven't really pushed yourself hard enough to see its dark side. You haven't tasted failure. You think you're good at something, so you really like it. You like the feeling of being good at something. That's 'passion'.

Doing a PhD makes you taste failure. A lot of it. You realize that you aren't actually good at said area. You realize that you are actually really, really bad at it. No matter how much 'passion' you thought you had, one day you are going to clutch at your hair and (with genuine passion this time) cry out "I HATE THIS." The 'passion' that you thought you had now reveals itself to be the biggest lie you were ever told (by yourself).

'Passion' is not an indicator of whether you should do a PhD. It is an indicator of how much you are wallowed in your comfort zone. It is an indicator of how flat you are about to fall on your face.

You should do a PhD only if you want to be a rare expert who is able to make novel and enduring intellectual contributions to the world.

Even the most 'passionate' PhD students will see their 'passion' dry up within the first 2-3 years. Do they quit? Some do, but most push on. Why? 

Because they have been humbled. Out of the shell of false passion comes a newfound humility that drives a dogged desire to learn, and to improve. They are no longer under any illusions that they are good at what they do. But they want to become good, they want to become great. And in finally achieving the milestone of a PhD, they know that they are only a small step towards someday making a difference to the world.

And then perhaps there is the birth of a new passion, not 'passion' borne out of minor, insignificant successes and cheap praise from people who don't know better, but a passion borne out of humility and driven towards the greater good, whether it is increasing humanity's body of knowledge and understanding of the world, or developing never-before-seen technologies to improve the lives of our less fortunate neighbours.

So no, you don't need 'passion' to pursue a PhD, because no matter how much of it you think you have, it will run out very quickly. But if you have at least a vague sense of wanting to be part of a global intellectual struggle, in which you will be constantly pushed and challenged, in which you will be smashed to bits then healed whole in a never-ending cycle, in which your own successes will forever be minuscule compared to the vastness of human ignorance and suffering yet unresolved, then I think you will be an excellent PhD.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Koszonom, Budapest!

A visit to a foreign country is always special. And when it is your first visit abroad, it automatically becomes memorable! What more, when it is the first time you speak technical stuff in front of expert, completely non-Indian, people- it is even more special to you! And well, when you don’t have to spend out of your pocket for this, isn’t it truly wonderful! A conference trip abroad, in my case, was special more so for the last reason- the unintended generosity of unknown taxpayers enabled me to fly across Eurasia, step into a foreign university and present a part of my work in front of a sizeable, learned audience. Such trips leave you small lessons, in addition to some mandatory networking which is the prime motive of these conferences, which are worth sharing. After all, a lakh and odd rupees spent on a person’s trip should be worth more than his own benefitting, right! So, here we go- a bit of conference experience first, and a short traveller’s expe...

Mind Matters- Introduction to the column

1.23 grams.  That's all it weighed! A crumpled mass years before- as watery as a melon , grey here and white there just like a middle aged man's beard- scattered in labs and museums across the world today, attracting handful of scientists poring into its secrets and countless awestruck visitors jostling to get a glimpse of genius- this was once the private property of a German immigrant in America, long deceased. One Mr. Albert Einstein. Humans, by design or by accident, are highly curious creatures. We are ever eager to know stuffs like how Swarzneggers build their beefy torsos, how Beckhams could bend it so well, or how gallons of milk that Dhoni drank in his adolescence contributed to his helicopter shot and what not! It is the same curiosity that made an Archimedes storm out of his bath and run into the town, which induced a Newton to churn formulae reportedly out of an rendezvous with an apple- which also led an Einstein turn physics world on its head...

The Sachins, Dravids and Dhonis of Science

Analogies and comparisons are always interesting, even if not useful! From declaring poetically that life is a bed of roses to calling Rajnikanths and Bachchans 'superstars'- analogies are omnipresent. So when I read somewhere about scientists who 'played' with machines in their childhood and sportspersons who get 'scientifically' trained, the analogy between the two instantaneously pops up in my mind. Sportspersons vie for cups and medals just like scientists who strive to grab a Nobel or a Fields medal. Sports and science both have had prodigies come up. Both have had the stories of some prodigies end up as tragedies. In sports, among the prodigies some fulfill their promise and dazzle others with their flamboyance and are revered as geniuses. And there are others, less prodigal but industrious, who methodically come up the ladder and stand up to the prodigies as equals. And there are champions of   a third kind, ...